Calcutta High Court

WPA/19992/2026 of ASIT KUMAR PAUL AND ANR Vs THE SERETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS AND ORS on 11 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Ct. No.446 Sl. No.1 akd W. P. A . 19992 of 2026 [Asit Kumar Paul & Anr. -Vs- The Secretary, Department of Urban Development & Municipal Affairs, Government of West Bengal & Ors.] Mr. Meghajit Mukherjee Mrs. Brinda Sen Gupta … … for the petitioners Mr. Arnab Mukherjee

21.09.2026

Ct. No.446

Sl. No.1

akd

W. P. A. 19992 of 2026

[Asit Kumar Paul & Anr. -Vs- The Secretary, Department of Urban Development & Municipal Affairs, Government of West Bengal & Ors.]

Mr. Meghajit Mukherjee

Mrs. Brinda Sen Gupta

… … for the petitioners

Mr. Arnab Mukherjee

Mr. Chandra Sekhar Sarkar

Ms. Susmita Das

… … for respondent nos.8 to 11

Mr. Biswajit Mukherjee

Mr. Dipankar Ghosh

Mr. Dipanjan Mukherjee

… … for the KMC

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This matter has been placed in the list at the instance of the petitioners since certain typographical errors have crept in the order dated 11th September, 2026.

2. In the 9th and 10th lines of paragraph 3 at page 2 of the order dated 11th September, 2026, it has been erroneously recorded as “Premises Nos. 86B and 86E, Canal Circular Road” in place and stead of “Premises No. 86E, Canal Circular Road.” Furthermore, in the 2nd and 3rd lines of paragraph 5 at page 3 of the said order, it has been erroneously recorded as “the occupiers of Premises No. 86B and those of the so-called fictitious holding bearing No. 86E have commenced construction” in place and stead of “occupiers of Premises No. 86E have commenced construction.”

3. Since the errors are typographical in nature and their correction is ministerial, the office is directed to carry out the aforesaid corrections in the said order in terms of this order. The other portions of the order shall remain unaltered.

2

4. Corrected certified copy of the order be handed over to the parties upon submission of the certified copy, if any, already issued to them.

(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead