Calcutta High Court
WPA/5019/2026 of ALAUDDIN AHMED Vs KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. on 11 September 2026
Ct. No.446 Sl. Nos.1 & 2 akd W. P. A . 5019 of 2026 (C. A . N. 1 of 2026) [Alauddin Ahmed -Vs- The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.] W I T H W. P. A . 27706 of 2024 [Faizuddin Ahmed -Vs- The Mayor, Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.] Mr. Subhrangsu Panda Mr. Aritra Ranjan
11.09.2026
Ct. No.446
Sl. Nos.1 & 2
akd
W. P. A. 5019 of 2026
(C. A. N. 1 of 2026)
[Alauddin Ahmed -Vs- The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.]
W I T H
W. P. A. 27706 of 2024
[Faizuddin Ahmed -Vs- The Mayor, Kolkata Municipal Corporation &
Ors.]
Mr. Subhrangsu Panda
Mr. Aritra Ranjan Dutta Roy
… … for the petitioner
Mr. Sandipan Banerjee
… … for the KMC
[in WPA 5019/2026]
Mr. Alok Kumar Ghosh
Mr. Biswajit Mukherjee
Mr. Fazlul Haque
Mr. Dwijadas Chakraborty
Ms. Gulnaz Quirashi
… … for the KMC
[in WPA 27706/2024]
Mr. Sukanta Ghosh
Mr. Arghya Chatterjee
… … for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Panda, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners, submits that his clients do not want to proceed with the present writ petitions. The written instruction submitted on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record.
2. In view of such submission made on behalf of the petitioners, the writ petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn.
3. There shall be no order as to costs.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)