Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/2601/2026 of KADIR SEKH @ KADIR SK AND ANR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 11 September 2026
11.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M ( A ) 2601 of 2026 Kadir Sekh @ Kadir Sk & Anr. Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik
M/L 160
11.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (A) 2601 of 2026
Kadir Sekh @ Kadir Sk & Anr.
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arising out of Bhutni Police Station Case No.
of
dated
13.03.2026
under
Sections
85/80/103(1)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
And
In the matter of : 1. Kadir Sekh @ Kadir Sk
2. Saheba Bibi
……Petitioners.
Mr. Sanat Kr. Das
Mr. Sujan Chatterjee
Mr. Rohan Bavishi
…for the Petitioners
Ms. Sreshtha Ghosh
Ms. Sanjana Jha
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners being the father-in-law and mother-in- law of the deceased has been falsely implicated in this case.
2. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
3. Attention of the Court has been drawn to the statement under Section 183 of BNSS of the neighbour.
4. I have taken into account the same and I find that the main accusations were against the husband. Be that as it may, as charge-sheet has already been submitted I am of the opinion that custodial detention of the present petitioners are unwarranted.
5. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners, namely, 1. Kadir Sekh @ Kadir Sk 2. Saheba Bibi be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/arresting officer of the case on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and proper. This would be subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
6. As charge-sheet has already been submitted, this order of anticipatory bail will remain in force for a period of six weeks.
7. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2601 of 2026 is allowed.
8. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record.
9. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
10. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)