Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1811/2026 of SANIYA PARWEEN @ SANIYA KHATOON Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 10 September 2026
10.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 Allowed IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (M) 1811 of 2026 Saniya Parween @ Saniya Khatoon Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/
D/L 14
10.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
Allowed
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (M) 1811 of 2026
Saniya Parween @ Saniya Khatoon
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with G.R. Case No. 492 of 2026 arising out of Kulti Police Station Case No. 100 of 2026 dated 26.02.2026 under Sections 103(1)/3(5) of BNS, 2023
And
In the matter of : Saniya Parween @ Saniya Khatoon
……Petitioner.
Mr. Tapas Kr. Ghosh
Mr. Tanmoy Chowdhury
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Brajesh Jha, A.P.P
Mr. Bikash Singh
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for six and a half months. Charge-sheet has already been submitted and case has been committed to the Court of Sessions. It is also contended that petitioner herself is having a child aged about nine to ten months and the case is based on circumstantial evidence.
2. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the Court to the statement of three witnesses under Section 183 of the BNSS and also the materials which reflect that the relationship between the present petitioner and the sister-in-law was not cordial.
3. There are no direct eye-witnesses in the present case. However, admittedly the child died because of drowning and having considered that the petitioner is a lady and the trial of the case would consume sometime I am inclined the release the petitioner on bail.
4. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. The petitioner, namely, Saniya Parween @ Saniya Khatoon shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Asansol, Paschim Bardhaman.
5. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the district of Paschim Bardhaman without prior permission of the learned Trial Court.
6. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M (M) 1811 of 2026 is allowed.
7. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)