Calcutta High Court

WPA/9627/2024 of TAHIR KHAN Vs THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE AND OTHERS on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No.10 AGM WPA 9627 of 2024 Tahir Khan vs. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue/WBGST, Government of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Subhasis Podder. ….for the petitioner Mr. Prithu Dudhoria. Ms. Shruti Dutta. ….for the State-respondents 1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging

10.09.26

Ct. No.10

AGM

WPA 9627 of 2024

Tahir Khan

vs.

Assistant Commissioner of Revenue/WBGST, Government of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Subhasis Podder.

….for the petitioner

Mr. Prithu Dudhoria.

Ms. Shruti Dutta.

….for the State-respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging inter alia, the legality and validity of the adjudication order dated 07.12.2023 passed by the respondent No. 1 and issue demand.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits as follows;

i. That a show cause notice in Form DRC 01 dated 09.08.2023 has been issued to the petitioner demanding tax, interest and penalty. ii. That said notice has been uploaded on the GST portal under the tab ‘Additional Notice and Orders’. iii. The petitioner came to know about the adjudication order dated 7.12.2023 after the order was passed. iv. There was no personal hearing afforded to your petitioner, as the same is evident from Show Cause Notice dated 9.8.2023. The column of preliminary hearing shows ‘NA’ at page 23 of the writ petition. v. That the entire proceedings and the impugned order are contrary to law and have been passed in violation of principles of natural justice and without due compliance with the procedure prescribed under the said Act.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the State respondents vehemently opposes the submissions made by the petitioner and submits that it is an admitted fact that hard copies of the show cause notice was already received by the petitioner, which is evident from the order dated 07.12.2023 being Annexure p/3 at page 28 of the writ petition. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been granted ample opportunities to defend his case.

4. Having heard the parties and upon perusing the records made available this Court observes as follows; i. The petitioner has been able to make out a prima facie case. ii. The fact that show cause notice and adjudication order had been uploaded only under the ‘tab Additional Notice and Orders’ and no separate intimation had been given, therefore, the petitioner was

unable to reply to the same. This constitutes a violation of natural justice.

5. In view of the above this Court directs as follows: a. The order in original passed by the respondent no. 1 dated 07.12.2023 is hereby quashed and set aside. b. Respondent no.

shall afford an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and pass a fresh reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within 12 weeks from date. Such decision shall be communicated to the petitioner within a week thereafter.

6. With the above observations and directions this writ petition stands disposed of.

7. Since no affidavit in opposition has been called for, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed to have been denied and not admitted.

8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.

(Smita Das De, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead