Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1275/2026 of JAGANNATH CHOWDHURY Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 10 September 2026
10.09.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (M) 1275 of 2026 Jagannath Chowdhury Vs The State of West Bengal & Anr. In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section
M/L 49
10.09.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.35
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (M) 1275 of 2026
Jagannath Chowdhury
Vs
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Purulia Town Police Station Case No. 22 of 2026 dated 17.01.2026 under Sections 137(2)/140(3)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023 And In the matter of : Jagannath Chowdhury
……Petitioner.
Mr. Kunal Ganguly
Ms. Madhurima Sarkar
Ms. Urmi Biswas
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Kalidas Saha
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner was arrested on 17th January, 2026 and since then he is in custody. Petitioner submits that petitioner was not identified by the victim.
2. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the present accused was identified in T.I. Parade.
3. Having taking into account the nature of offence having been committed under Section 70 (2) of the BNS and the materials appearing against the present petitioner, at this stage I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
4. Accordingly, C.R.M (M) 1275 of 2026 is dismissed.
5. Memo of evidence in respect of service be kept with the record.
6. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court.
7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)