Calcutta High Court
WPA(P)/429/2026 of BIWANATH HALAR AND ORS. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 10 September 2026
PG/KS Ct. No.1 W.P.A. (P) 429 of 2026 Biswanath Haldar & Ors. Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sufi Kamal Mr. Koushal Kumar Mr. Shireen Hossain ……….For the Petitioners Mr. D. N. Ray, Ld. G.P. Mr. Debapriya Gupta, Ld. A.G.P. Mr. Arijit Bhowmick Mr. Mrinal Kanti
10.09.2026
Item No.10
PG/KS
Ct. No.1
W.P.A. (P) 429 of 2026
Biswanath Haldar & Ors.
Vs.
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sufi Kamal
Mr. Koushal Kumar
Mr. Shireen Hossain
……….For the Petitioners
Mr. D. N. Ray, Ld. G.P.
Mr. Debapriya Gupta, Ld. A.G.P.
Mr. Arijit Bhowmick
Mr. Mrinal Kanti Biswas
………..For the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned Government Pleader has taken instructions and has shown to us a copy of the communication dated 10.09.2026 received by him from the Officer-in-Charge, Usthi Police Station, Diamond Harbour PD, South 24 Parganas. Copy of the said written instruction, is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification.
2. We have gone through the same. The same has also been perused by the learned advocate for the Petitioner.
3. In view of the above, we expressed our disinclination to entertain this Petition.
4. Learned advocate for the Petitioner submits on instructions that the Petitioner desires to withdraw this Petition.
5. In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as withdrawn, on instructions.
6. Before parting with this matter, we draw the attention of the learned advocate appearing for the Petitioner to certain objectionable word used in the memo of the Petition, with a cautionary note to the Petitioner, not to make baseless and reckless allegations against unknown women alleging that they are indulging in immortal activities.
7. We also direct the Petitioner that henceforth, in no Petition, the words that are used in paragraph 6 of this Petition, should be used in the Memo of the Petition or in the open Court.
8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be given to the parties upon compliance of usual formalities.
(TAPABRATA CHAKRABORTY, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, CJ.)
2