Calcutta High Court

CRM(M)/1809/2026 of MRINMOY MAJUMDER Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.12 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Allowed C.R.M. (M) 1809 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Petrapole Police Station Case No. 39 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

10.09.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.12

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Allowed C.R.M. (M) 1809 of 2026

In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, filed in connection with Petrapole Police Station Case No. 39 of 2026 dated 19.04.2026 under Sections 318(2)/319(2)/ 338/336(2)/340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 21 of Immigration and Foreigners Act (G.R. Case No. 997 of 2026).

And

In Re : Mrinmoy Majumder

... Petitioner.

Mr. Shounak Mondal

... For the Petitioner.

Mr. Parmanand Sharma, APP, Mr. Sayan Mukherjee

... For the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than four and a half months and charge-sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional court. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the materials appearing against the petitioner and the fact that trial of the case would consume some time. Having regard to the same, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz., Mrinmoy Majumder shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bongaon. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of the district of North 24-Parganas without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. The application for bail, being CRM (M) 1809 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead