Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/1808/2026 of ANJALI KISKU Vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 10 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.11 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (M) 1808 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Nayagram Police Station Case No. 09 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
10.09.2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.11
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (M) 1808 of 2026
In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, filed in connection with Nayagram Police Station Case No. 09 of 2026 dated 05.02.2026 under Sections 103(1)/238/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
And
In Re : Anjali Kisku
... Petitioner.
Md. Abdur Rakib, Mr. Shraman Sarkar, Mr. Mojahid Mehedi
... For the Petitioner.
Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das, APP, Mr. P. Karan Singh
... For the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 07.02.2026. Petitioner is having two minor children and has been implicated in the instant case out of grudge. The nature of the case, according to the petitioner, relates to alleged extramarital affair of the husband of the present petitioner with the deceased. The dead body of the deceased was found at an abandoned place. As such, the complicity of the petitioner, as has been narrated in the prosecution case, is of hardly any relevance. Charge-sheet has already been submitted. As such, petitioner prays for bail on any stringent condition. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the Court to the seizure list, particularly in respect of recovery of the offending weapon and wearing apparels along with other materials being seized from both the accused persons. I have taken into account the materials appearing in the case diary including the post mortem report. Having regard to the recoveries which have been made, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, State is directed to collect the FSL report in respect of the wearing apparels which have been sent. Let the FSL report be submitted before the jurisdictional court within a period of three months. Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the process so that vulnerable witnesses are examined within a reasonable period of time. Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. The application for bail, being CRM (M) 1808 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)