Calcutta High Court
WP.CT/11/2026 of JOYDEV MAHANTA AND ORS Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. on 10 September 2026
15 Saikat Mukherjee WP.CT/11/2026 with CAN/1/2026 JOYDEV MAHANTA AND ORS. VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Mr. Bratin Kr. Dey, Adv. Ms. Anjana Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Pandey, Adv. Mr. Subhankar Banerjee, Adv. ...For the Writ Petitioners Mr. D.N. Ray, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kr. Shah, Adv. Mr.
Ct.No.1 D/L 10.09.2026
Saikat
Mukherjee
WP.CT/11/2026
with
CAN/1/2026
JOYDEV MAHANTA AND ORS.
VS.
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Mr. Bratin Kr. Dey, Adv.
Ms. Anjana Banerjee, Adv.
Mr. Pradeep Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Subhankar Banerjee, Adv.
...For the Writ Petitioners
Mr. D.N. Ray, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Rajesh Kr. Shah, Adv.
Mr. Sourav Mondal, Adv.
Mr. Avijittansu Ray , Adv.
...For the Respondents
ORDER (Per Court)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. An over-night pass-over was granted to learned advocate for the Petitioners to take instruction.
2. Today the learned advocate places on record a copy of the written instructions received from the Petitioners, requesting for leave to withdraw the Petition and the Application for amendment. The said communication is marked as ‘X’ for identification.
3. In view of the above, this Petition as well as the Application stands disposed off as withdrawn on instructions. (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.) (Ravindra V. Ghuge ) Chief Justice