Calcutta High Court
CRR/1904/2026 of MADHUMITA DHANG Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 10 September 2026
Court No.34 Sl. No. 5. sg CRR 1904 of 2026 With CRAN 1 of 2026 In the matter of : Madhumita Dhang ..Petitioner. Dr. Achin Jana Mr. Prosenjit Ghosh Ms. Chetna Rustagi Ms. Darothi Mukherjee …for the petitioner. Mr. Sabir Ahmed Mr. Prasun Mukherjee Mr. Indranil Roychowdhury Ms. Pramita
10.9.2026
Court No.34
Sl. No. 5.
sg
CRR 1904 of 2026
With
CRAN 1 of 2026
In the matter of : Madhumita Dhang
..Petitioner.
Dr. Achin Jana
Mr. Prosenjit Ghosh
Ms. Chetna Rustagi
Ms. Darothi Mukherjee
…for the petitioner.
Mr. Sabir Ahmed
Mr. Prasun Mukherjee
Mr. Indranil Roychowdhury
Ms. Pramita Banerjee
…for the opposite party.
Mr. Ranajoy Chatterjee
Ms. Jayashree Patra
…for the State.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Joint compromise petition has been filed before this Court by both the petitioners.
2. Opposite parties are represented.
3. On behalf of the State learned advocate representing Mr. Ronojoy Chatterjee and Ms. Jayashree Patra submits a report which reflects that the proceedings have been settled by mutual discussion and the complainant has decided not to proceed with the above mentioned case.
2
4. Report has been submitted in CRR 2767 of 2026 which reflects that the Malipanchghora P.S. Case No. 184 of 2020 dated 17.11.2020 under Sections 341/323/325/354B/506/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Malipanchghora P.S. Case No. 185 dated 17.11.2020 under Sections 348/323/325/354B/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code has been settled between the parties to that extent to that report has been placed by the concerned Inspector- in-charge of Malipanchghora Police Station.
5. Let the report be kept with the record.
6. In view of the facts and circumstances there is no reason to allow the proceeding to continue further as it would yield no result, hence the revisional applications stands disposed of. Proceeding pending before the learned Court is hereby quashed against the petitioner.
7. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Hon’ble High Court.
[Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J.]