Calcutta High Court
WP.CT/211/2024 of UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs SK MOHIUDDIN AND ORS on 10 September 2026
12 Saikat Mukherjee WP.CT/211/2024 with CAN/1/2024 with CAN/2/2025 with CAN/3/2025 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. VS. SK MOHIUDDIN AND ORS Mr. Pinaki Ranjan Chakraborty, Adv. Mr. Guddu Singh, Adv. ...For the Writ Petitioners Mr. Goutam Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Ibrahim Shikh, Adv. Ms. Benazir Shaikh,
Ct.No.1 D/L 10.09.2026
Saikat
Mukherjee
WP.CT/211/2024
with
CAN/1/2024
with
CAN/2/2025
with
CAN/3/2025
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
VS.
SK MOHIUDDIN AND ORS
Mr. Pinaki Ranjan Chakraborty, Adv.
Mr. Guddu Singh, Adv.
...For the Writ Petitioners
Mr. Goutam Banerjee, Adv.
Mr. Ibrahim Shikh, Adv.
Ms. Benazir Shaikh, Adv.
Mr. Subrata Mukherjee, Adv.
...For the Respondents
ORDER (Per Court)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned advocate for the Respondents cites a judgment dated 24th February, 2026, delivered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in a group of cases in Civil Appeal No. 4432 of 2019 (Union of India & Ors. vs. E Sreeramulu & Ors.), by which the issue raised in this Petition was adjudicated upon and the judgment is delivered against the Union of India.
2. Learned counsel for the Union of India confirms that such a judgment is delivered in E Sreeramulu and connected matters and the view of the Hon’ble Supreme
Court, is against the Union of India. He fairly submits that the present Petition is governed by the said judgment.
3. In view of the above, since the Hon’ble Supreme Court has crystallised the law, this Petition is dismissed. Pending Applications are also dismissed. (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.) (Ravindra V. Ghuge ) Chief Justice