Calcutta High Court

WPA(P)/396/2026 of KHAWAJA GHARIB NAWAZ ORGANIZATION Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 9 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. 1 RP W.P.A.(P) 396 of 2026 KHAWAJA GHARIB NAWAZ ORGANISATION Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL & Ors. Mr. Pritam choudhury Mr. Md. Habibur Rahaman ….. For the Petitioners Mr. Rajdeep Mazumdar, Ld. AAG Mr. Nikunj Berlia, Ld. AGP Mr. Madhu Jana Mr. Srijit Halder …..For State 1. We have

09.09.2026

Item No.2

Ct. No. 1

RP

W.P.A.(P) 396 of 2026

KHAWAJA GHARIB NAWAZ ORGANISATION

Vs

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & Ors.

Mr. Pritam choudhury

Mr. Md. Habibur Rahaman

….. For the Petitioners

Mr. Rajdeep Mazumdar, Ld. AAG

Mr. Nikunj Berlia, Ld. AGP

Mr. Madhu Jana

Mr. Srijit Halder

…..For State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. We have heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Additional Advocate General for Respondent nos.1, 2, 3 and 4.

2. We are informed that on the complaint of the Petitioner, investigation has commenced and a notice under Section 94 of the BNSS was issued to the complainant calling upon the complainant to provide supporting documents. The Cyber Cell of DRO CD has also asked for the details about the URL used by the accused persons.

3. The learned advocate for the Petitioner has some issues as regards the notice having been served upon the Petitioner. However, he submits that if a particular date is informed to the Petitioner, he will appear before Narkeldanga Police Station with reference to case no. 350/26

underSection196(1)/299/302/353(1)(b)/353(2)/ 356(2)/61 of the BNS and tender supporting documents to the concerned investigating officer.

4. By consent of the Petitioner, it is recorded that the Petitioner would appear before the said police station on 16.09.2026 at 12’O noon and produce the materials on which the Petitioner desires to place reliance upon.

5. Needless to state, after such appearance and tendering of documents, the concerned police station will initiate appropriate steps as per the procedure laid down in law. The Petitioner agrees to render fullest cooperation in the investigation.

6. The learned Additional Advocate General submits that the investigation would be conducted expeditiously subject to fullest cooperation of the Petitioner.

7. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed off.

(Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.) (Ravindra V. Ghuge, CJ.)

2

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead