Calcutta High Court
FMA/1117/2026 of SATINATH GOSWAMI Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 9 September 2026
No. 1 RP FMA 1117 OF 2026 WITH IA NO.CAN 1 OF 2026 SATINATH GOSWAMI Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL & Ors. Mr. Pratip Kumar Chatterjee, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ipsita Ghosh ….. For the Appellant Mr. D.N. Ray, Ld. GP Mr. Guddu Singh Mr. S. Halder …..For State 1. Affidavit- of -Service filed in
09.09.2026
Item No11
Ct. No. 1
RP
FMA 1117 OF 2026
WITH
IA NO.CAN 1 OF 2026
SATINATH GOSWAMI
Vs
STATE OF WEST BENGAL & Ors.
Mr. Pratip Kumar Chatterjee, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Ipsita Ghosh
….. For the Appellant
Mr. D.N. Ray, Ld. GP
Mr. Guddu Singh
Mr. S. Halder
…..For State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit-of-Service filed in Court today, be taken on record.
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the Appellant for quite sometime. We have gone through the Memo of the Appeal. We have considered the record placed before us. We have also considered the earlier orders passed by the learned Single Judge dated 21.02.2025 in WPA 3160 of 2025 and by the learned Division Bench dated 27.07.2026 in WPA 15725 of 2026.
3. We find that the dispute between the Petitioner and Respondent nos.7-15, is purely a Civil dispute regarding the agricultural land.
4. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits on instructions that the Petitioner would approach the Civil Court and seek appropriate direction, including perpetual injunction against those offending his rights qua his agricultural land.
5. In view of the above, this Petition and the connected Application are disposed off as withdrawn on instructions. If the Petitioner approaches the Civil Court and seeks redressal of his grievances, all contentions of all the litigating parties are kept open.
6. Insofar as the earlier direction of this Court is concerned, the same shall be taken into account by the concerned authorities, as well as by the Civil Court. (Tapabrata Chakraborty,J.) (Ravindra V. Ghuge, CJ.)
2