Calcutta High Court
MAT/1462/2026 of SAMBHU PANDIT Vs THE HALDIA MUNICIPALITY AND ORS on 8 September 2026
Court. No. 12 GB MAT 1462 of 2026 With CAN 1 of 2026 With CAN 2 of 2026 Sambhu Pandit VS The Haldia Municipality & Ors. Mr. Sukumar Ghosh, Ms. Moumita Ghosh … for the Appellant. Mr. S.M. Hassan, Ms. Anupama Yasmin … for the Municipality. Mr. Salil Kumar Maiti, Mr. Tanmoy
Item No.7
08.09.2026
Court. No. 12
GB
MAT 1462 of 2026
With
CAN 1 of 2026
With
CAN 2 of 2026
Sambhu Pandit
VS
The Haldia Municipality & Ors.
Mr. Sukumar Ghosh,
Ms. Moumita Ghosh
… for the Appellant.
Mr. S.M. Hassan,
Ms. Anupama Yasmin
… for the Municipality.
Mr. Salil Kumar Maiti,
Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee,
Ms. Dolan Samanta
… for the Respondent No.6.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The order impugned was passed in CPAN 1068 of 2024. The appellant is not a party to the said proceeding. Hence, the appeal cannot be entertained in the absence of any application for leave to appeal.
2. However, upon considering the order impugned, we do not find that any portion of Her Lordship’s order has affected the construction of the appellant. The directions of Her Lordship in the contempt are against the District Magistrate.
3. Under such circumstances, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed as no useful purpose will be served by regularizing the appeal. Consequently, the appeal is also dismissed as time barred.
4. The appellant is at liberty to take appropriate steps before the appropriate Court.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)
(Arjun Ray Mukherjee, J.)