Calcutta High Court
WPA(P)/338/2026 of PAYEL MAJI Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 8 September 2026
Court No.04 B.K.N W.P.A. (P) 338 of 2026 Payel Maji Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Arindam Sen, Mr. Saurav Basu, Mr. Rajdeep Pramanik, Mr. sumik Biswas … for the Petitioner. Mr. Ajit Kr. Mishra, Ld. AGP, Mr. Milind Mohul Ghosh … for the State. Mr. Sarajit Sen, Mr.
S/L 03
08.09.2026
Court No.04
B.K.N
W.P.A. (P) 338 of 2026
Payel Maji
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Arindam Sen,
Mr. Saurav Basu,
Mr. Rajdeep Pramanik,
Mr. sumik Biswas
… for the Petitioner.
Mr. Ajit Kr. Mishra, Ld. AGP,
Mr. Milind Mohul Ghosh
… for the State.
Mr. Sarajit Sen,
Mr. Tapas Singha Roy,
Ms. Sreelekha Mondal
… for the Respondent No. 10.
Mr. Palash Bapari,
Mr. Chandan Chakraborty
… for the Private Respondent.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Panchayat authorities have submitted a communication dated 05.09.2026 wherein after considering the stand of the parties they have recorded an order that they did not find any slaughtering activity going on in the concerned premises.
2. The last paragraph of the order reserves the right of the Panchayat to review/cancel or revoke the registration at any time in case of default. We leave it to the writ petitioner to assail this order or agitate a violation of the licence, if the occasion so arises.
3. The writ petition is disposed of.
4. The communication dated 05.09.2026 be kept on record.
5. Urgent Photostat Certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all necessary formalities.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J.)
(Partha Pratim Roy, J.)