Calcutta High Court
WPA/8473/2021 of PRAKASH SHAH Vs PRINCIPAL ADDL DIR., DIRECTOR OF REV. INTELLIGENCE AND ORS on 3 September 2026
No.42 Saikat Mukherjee WPA/8473/2021 PRAKASH SHAH VS. PRINCIPAL ADDL DIR., DIRECTOR OF REV. INTELLIGENCE AND ORS. Mr. Rishi Raju, Adv. Mr. Adrish Dutta, Adv. ….For the Petitioner Mr. Kaushik Dey, Adv. Mr. Tapan Bhanja, Adv. …For the Opposite Parties 1. The matter is appearing in
03.09.2026
D/L.3
Ct. No.42
Saikat
Mukherjee
WPA/8473/2021
PRAKASH SHAH
VS.
PRINCIPAL ADDL DIR., DIRECTOR OF REV.
INTELLIGENCE AND ORS.
Mr. Rishi Raju, Adv.
Mr. Adrish Dutta, Adv.
….For the Petitioner
Mr. Kaushik Dey, Adv.
Mr. Tapan Bhanja, Adv.
…For the Opposite Parties
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The matter is appearing in the today’s cause list under the heading ‘To Be Mentioned’ at the instance of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner draws my attention to the paragraphs 3 and 4 of the supplementary affidavit along with petitioner for withdrawal filed by the petitioner and submits that since vires of challenge has already been settled by Hon’ble Supreme Court against the petitioner vide in its judgment dated March 9, 2021, passed in Canon India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs reported in
SCC
and subsequently in judgment dated November 7, 2024, in a matter Commissioner of Customs vs. Canon India Pvt. Ltd. reported in (2025) 4 SCC 509, the instant matter becomes infructuous and the learned counsel for petitioner prays for withdrawal of this writ application.
2. The other side has no objection.
3. In view of the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner and the afore-mentioned judgments passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. There shall be no order as to costs.
(UDAY KUMAR, J.)