Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/2281/2026 of SIBANI HAZRA @ SHIBANI HAZRA AND ORS. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 1 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Sl. No.23 Ct. 446/tkm C. R. M. ( A ) 2281 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chandipur Police Station Case No. 190 of 2026 dated 22.06.2026 under Sections 109/115(2)/118(1)/3(5)/329(3)/351(2)

01.09.2026

Sl. No.23

Ct. 446/tkm

C. R. M. (A) 2281 of 2026

In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chandipur Police Station Case No. 190 of 2026 dated 22.06.2026 under Sections 109/115(2)/118(1)/3(5)/329(3)/351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

And

In Re: Sibani Hazra @ Shibani Hazra & Ors.

… … Petitioners

Mr. Suman De

… … for the petitioners

Allowed

Mr. Amal Kr. Datta

Mr. Karan Dudhwewala

… … for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. De, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners, submits that following a free fight between two groups of people who were closely related to each other, the alleged incident occurred. He submits that petitioner no. 3 also suffered serious injuries on her person. He prays for anticipatory bail for the petitioners.

2. Mr. Datta, learned Advocate appearing for the State, produces the case diary and memo of evidence and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He submits that the injury report suggests that the victim suffered serious injuries on a vital part of the body.

3. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties and perused the materials in the Case Diary, including the injury report.

4. Noting the nature of the injuries as reflected in the injury report and considering that the incident allegedly occurred in the presence of direct evidence, I am of the view that the privilege

2 under Section 482 of the BNSS can be extended in favour of the petitioners.

5. Accordingly, I direct that, in the event of arrest, the petitioners viz. Sibani Hazra @ Shibani Hazra, Suresh Hazra and Sumana Hazra Ghorai @ Mou Ghorai Hazra shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned CJM Purba Medinipur at Tamluk and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.

6. The application being CRM (A) 2281 of 2026 is disposed of.

(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead