Calcutta High Court
CRR/2074/2024 of SNEHA ROY Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 1 September 2026
Ct No. 42 Saikat Mukherjee CRR 2074 of 2024 with CRAN 1 of 2024 with CRAN 2 of 2026 SNEHA ROY VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR. Mr. Sandip Kr. Bhattacharya, Mr. Dipta Dipak Banerjee … for the petitioner Mr. Joydeep Das … for the O.P. No. 2 Dr. Achin Jana Mr. Arijit Bhusan
01.09.2026
D/L 27
Ct No. 42
Saikat
Mukherjee
CRR 2074 of 2024
with
CRAN 1 of 2024
with
CRAN 2 of 2026
SNEHA ROY
VS.
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.
Mr. Sandip Kr. Bhattacharya,
Mr. Dipta Dipak Banerjee … for the petitioner
Mr. Joydeep Das
… for the O.P. No. 2
Dr. Achin Jana
Mr. Arijit Bhusan Bagchi … for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Parties are represented by their respective learned counsel.
2. The petitioner, by the present revisional application, has prayed for quashing of the impugned proceeding being Case No. CGR- 2874 of 2022, arising out of the Lake Police Station Case No. 267 of 2022 dated September 19, 2022 under Sections 498A/406/34/354D of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, presently pending before the Learned 6th Judicial Magistrate, Alipore.
3. The learned counsel for the parties apprise this Court that pursuant to amicable settlement of the dispute reached between the parties, a joint compromise petition along with the Memorandum of Understanding reflecting the terms of the said settlement has been annexed with one of the aforementioned CRAN application(CRAN 2 of 2026).
4. Learned counsel for the State also files a report of the Officer-in-Charge, Lake Police Station wherefrom the impugned proceeding was initiated, let the said report be taken on record.
5. The said report encloses the statement of the complainant/Opposite Party No. 2 recorded on August 11, 2026 wherein, she has recorded her ‘No-Objection’ to the joint compromise for settling the impugned criminal proceeding (Lake P.S. Case No. 267 of 2022).
6. Considering the aforesaid statement made by the complainant and the Memorandum of Understanding executed and jointly filed by the parties towards settlement of the matter, I am inclined to allow the prayer made in the said CRAN application.
7. The impugned proceeding being Case No. CGR- 2874 of 2022 arising out of the aforementioned Lake P.S. Case No. 267 of 2022, is hereby quashed.
8. Accordingly, CRR 2074 of 2024 along with CRAN 1 of 2024 and CRAN 2 of 2026 are disposed of.
9. There shall be no order as to costs.
10. Interim order, if any, stands hereby vacated.
11. Case Diary to be returned forthwith.
12. Urgent Photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties, upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Uday Kumar, J.)