Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/2289/2026 of MANSURUL ANWAR @ MD MANSURUL ANWAR AND ORS. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 1 September 2026
Sl. No.25 Ct. 446/tkm C. R. M. ( A ) 2289 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Khanakul Police Station Case No. 160 of 2026 dated 08.03.2026 under Sections
01.09.2026
Sl. No.25
Ct. 446/tkm
C. R. M. (A) 2289 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Khanakul Police Station Case No. 160 of 2026 dated 08.03.2026 under Sections 115(2)/117(2)/76/303(2)/352/351(3)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
And
In Re: Mansurul Anwar @ Md. Mansurul Anwar & Ors.
… … Petitioners
Mr. N S Ghosh
Ms. Laboni Sikdar
Mr. S Dey
… … for the petitioners
Allowed
Mr. Suman Chakraborty
… … for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Ghosh, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners, submits that, out of personal grudge, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS has been served upon the petitioners and that they have complied with the terms of the said notice. He prays for pre-arrest bail for the petitioners.
2. Mr. Chakraborty, learned Advocate for the State produces the case diary, memo of evidence and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
3. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties and perused the materials in the Case Diary. The petitioners have complied with the terms of the notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS. Noting this fact and considering that the incident allegedly occurred in the presence of direct evidence, I am of the view that the privilege under Section 482 of the BNSS can be extended in favour of the petitioners.
2
4. Accordingly, I direct that, in the event of arrest, the petitioners viz. Mansurul Anwar @ Md. Mansurul Anwar, Masudul Anwar @ Sk Masudul Anowar @ Md. Masadul Anwar and Majharul Anwar @ Majarul Anowar shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM Arambagh and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.
5. The application being CRM (A) 2289 of 2026 is disposed of.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)