Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/2307/2026 of RINA MAITY Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 31 August 2026
Sl. No.37 Ct. 446/tkm C. R. M. ( A ) 2307 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Tamluk Police Station Case No. 378 of 2026 dated 02.06.2026 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/109/351(2)/3(5) of the
31.08.2026
Sl. No.37
Ct. 446/tkm
C. R. M. (A) 2307 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Tamluk Police Station Case No. 378 of 2026 dated 02.06.2026 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/109/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
And
In Re: Rina Maity & Ors.
… … Petitioners
Mr. Ranadeb Sengupta
Mr. S Maity
… … for the petitioners
Allowed
Mr. Priyankar Ganguly
Ms. Shalini Bairagi
… … for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that, owing to political rivalry and personal grudge, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case. He submits that the benefit under Section 482 of the BNSS may be extended in favour of the petitioners.
2. Learned Advocate for the State produces the case diary and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
3. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties and perused the materials in the case diary, including the medical documents available therein and the statements of the witnesses recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS. On further consideration that the incident occurred in the presence of direct evidence, I am of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not necessary and that the privilege under Section 482 of the BNSS can be extended in favour of the petitioners.
4. Accordingly, I direct that, in the event of arrest, the petitioners, shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-
2 each (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Purba Medinipur and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.
5. The application being CRM (A) 2307 of 2026 is disposed of.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)