Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/2282/2026 of NOOR ALI SEKH @ NUR ALI SEKH AND ANR. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 31 August 2026
Sl. No.5 Ct. 446/tkm C. R. M. ( A ) 2282 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed on 13.07.2026 in connection with Hasnabad Police Station Case No. 350 of 2026 dated 20.05.2026 under Sections
31.08.2026
Sl. No.5
Ct. 446/tkm
C. R. M. (A) 2282 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed on 13.07.2026 in connection with Hasnabad Police Station Case No. 350 of 2026 dated 20.05.2026 under Sections 326(g)/323/351(3)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. (G.R. Case No. 2544 of 2026)
And
In Re: Noor Ali Sekh @ Nur Ali Sekh & Anr.
… … Petitioners
Mr. Prantick Ghosh
Ms. Sabana Hasin
Ms. Pulami Saha
… … for the petitioners
Allowed
Mr. Ayan Mitra
… … for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Ghosh, learned Advocate for the petitioners submits that, due to political rivalry and personal grudge, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the houses of both the petitioners were ransacked and the inmates of their houses were assaulted and abused, and even two members were arrested in connection with another case. He submits that there are no specific allegations against the petitioners. Taking recourse to Section 3(5) of the BNSS, the petitioners have been implicated in this case. He prays for bail.
2. Mr. Mitra, learned Advocate for the State produces the case diary, memo of evidence and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
3. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties and perused the materials in the Case Diary, including the seizure list and the statements of the witnesses recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS. The main allegation is directed against
2 one Saidul Sk. Considering the fact that there is no allegation of any specific overt act against petitioner no. 1, I am of the view that the privilege under Section 482 of the BNSS can be extended in his favour. However, certain incriminating materials are available against petitioner no. 2 in the Case Diary. Hence, his prayer for bail is rejected.
4. Accordingly, I direct that, in the event of arrest, the petitioner no. 1 viz. Noor Ali Sekh @ Nur Ali Sekh shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned CJM North 24 Pgs. at Barasat and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023. Petitioner no. 1 shall meet the IO once in a week till submission of charge sheet.
5. The application being CRM (A) 2282 of 2026 is disposed of.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)