Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/2253/2026 of DULAL MONDAL @ NEPAL MONDAL AND ANR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 31 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Sl. No.4 Ct. 446/tkm C. R. M. ( A ) 2253 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kulti Police Station Case No.94 of 2026 dated 19.02.2026 under sections

31.08.2026

Sl. No.4

Ct. 446/tkm

C. R. M. (A) 2253 of 2026

In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kulti Police Station Case No.94 of 2026 dated 19.02.2026 under sections 318(4)/319(1)/336(1)/336(3)/338/340(2)/61(2)/3(5) BNS 2023

And

In Re: Dulal Mondal @ Nepal Mondal & Anr.

… … Petitioners

Allowed

Ms. Sreemoyee Mukherjee

… … for the petitioners

Mr. Prosenjit Ghosh

… … for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Ms. Mukherjee, learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner allegedly acted as a witness to the deed. He submits that Sarthak Banerjee was the principal accused, who has since died. He prays for bail.

2. Mr. Ghosh, learned Advocate for the State produces the case diary, memo of evidence and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

3. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties and perused the materials in the Case Diary. The prosecution case is based on documentary evidence, and the investigation has proceeded fairly, with the prosecution having collected all relevant documents. Therefore, I find no reason to hold that custodial interrogation of the petitioners, for the progress of the investigation, is necessary, and that the privilege under Section 482 of the BNSS can be extended in favour of the petitioners.

4. Accordingly, I direct that, in the event of arrest, each of the petitioners namely, 1) Dulal Mondal @ Nepal Mondal and 2) Prabir Bhattacharya shall be released on bail upon furnishing a

2 bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned CJM Paschim Bardhaman, Asansol and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023. Petitioners shall meet the IO once in a fortnight till submission of charge sheet.

5. The application being CRM (A) 2253 of 2026 is disposed of.

(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead