Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/2296/2026 of GANESH MANDAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 31 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Ct. No. 446 Sl. No.29 akd [ALLOWED] C. R. M. ( A ) 2296 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed on 10.07.2026 in connection with English Bazar Police Station Case No. 514 of 2026 dated 06.04.2026 under Sections

31.08.2026

Ct. No. 446

Sl. No.29

akd

[ALLOWED]

C. R. M. (A) 2296 of 2026

In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed on 10.07.2026 in connection with English Bazar Police Station Case No. 514 of 2026

dated 06.04.2026 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/118(1)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

And

In Re: Ganesh Mandal

… … Petitioner

Mr. Apan Saha

Mr. Mosaraf Hossain

Mr. Tasnim Ahamed

Mr. Sarfary Noway

… … for the petitioner

Mr. Debapratim Guha

… … for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This is an application for anticipatory bail filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with English Bazar Police Station Case No. 514 of 2026 dated 06.04.2026 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/118(1)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case. He further submits that two co-accused persons, standing on the same footing, have been granted pre-arrest bail by the learned Sessions Judge, Malda, in Criminal Misc. Case No. 1160 of 2026. In such conspectus, according to him, custodial interrogation of the present petitioner is not necessary.

3. Mr. Guha, learned Advocate appearing for the State/respondents, produces the Memo of Evidence as well as the case diary and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner on the basis of the

2 materials available therein. The Memo of Evidence filed in Court today is taken on record.

4. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for both the parties and perused the case diary as well as the other materials on record including the Memo of Evidence.

5. Two co-accused persons have been granted pre-arrest bail. The incident allegedly occurred in the presence of direct evidence. Considering the nature of the injuries as reflected in the injury report, I am of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary and that he may be granted anticipatory bail.

6. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the accused/petitioner, namely, Ganesh Mandal, be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Malda and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till submission of the charge.

7. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead