Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/2286/2026 of GOPAL BERA AND ANR. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 31 August 2026
Sl. No. 20 Ct. No. 446 SG [ALLOWED] C. R. M. ( A ) 2286 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Tamluk Police Station Case No. 423/2026 dated 12.06.2026 under Sections 329(4)/ 115(2)/ 117(2)/ 110/
31.08.2026
Sl. No. 20
Ct. No. 446
SG
[ALLOWED]
C. R. M. (A) 2286 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Tamluk Police Station Case No. 423/2026 dated 12.06.2026 under Sections 329(4)/ 115(2)/ 117(2)/ 110/ 351(2)/ 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,
2023.
And
In Re: Gopal Bera & Anr.
… … Petitioners
Mr. Tapodip Gupta,
Mr. Suman Bhanja,
Mr. Golam Ahammed.
… for the petitioners
Mr. Kaustav Manna,
Mr. Sanjib Das.
… for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mr. Gupta, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners, submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case out of personal grudge. He prays for pre-arrest bail for the petitioners.
2. Mr. Manna, learned Advocate appearing for the State, produces the case diary and memorandum of evidence and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
3. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties and perused the case diary and other materials, including the injury report. Considering the nature of the injuries as reflected in the injury report and the fact that the incident allegedly occurred in the presence of direct evidence, I am of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not necessary.
4. In view of the above, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.
5. Accordingly, I direct that, in the event of arrest, the petitioners, viz. (1) Gopal Bera and (2) Pradip Bera @ Pradip Chandra Bera
2 be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Purba Medinipur at Tamluk and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and on further condition petitioner shall meet the investigating officer once in a fortnight until submission of charge- sheet.
6. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)