Calcutta High Court
CO/429/2026 of PINAKI DEB @ PINAKI RANJAN DEB Vs ANUPAMA DEB on 28 August 2026
Ct. no. 21 SL. 14 Samarpita In the High Court at Calcutta Civil Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side CO/429/2026 PINAKI DEB @ PINAKI RANJAN DEB VS ANUPAMA DEB Mr. Soumya Basu Roy Chowdhury .. for the petitioner 1. The learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that petitioner does
28.8.2026
Ct. no. 21
SL. 14
Samarpita
In the High Court at Calcutta
Civil Revisional Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CO/429/2026
PINAKI DEB @ PINAKI RANJAN DEB
VS
ANUPAMA DEB
Mr. Soumya Basu Roy Chowdhury
.. for the petitioner
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that petitioner does not intend to proceed with the present revisional application, and to that effect a letter has been furnished, let the letter be kept with the record.
2. As the petitioner does not intend to proceed with the present revisional application, the present revisional application is dismissed as not pressed.
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)