Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/2274/2026 of AMENUR ISLAM @ AMINUR RAHAMAN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 28 August 2026
Court No.446 S.Gayen IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.( A ) 2274 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Harirampur Police Station Case No. 177
28.08.2026
SL No.28
Court No.446
S.Gayen
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M.(A) 2274 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Harirampur Police Station Case No. 177 of 2026 dated 19.05.2026
under Sections 115(2)/126(2)/74/351(3)/316(2)/318(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
-And-
In the matter of: Amenur Islam @ Aminur Rahaman …Petitioner
Mr. Samrat Chowdhury
Ms. Jeenia Rudra
Mr. Rishab Deb Barman
Ms. Sukanya Banerjee
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Kaustav Manna
Mr. Sajib Das
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This instant application has been filed with a prayer for anticipatory bail.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Out of the three accused persons, two accused persons are on bail. He submits that the privilege under Section 482 of the BNSS can be extended in favour of the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the State produces the case diary and the Memo of Evidence and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. The Memo of Evidence submitted by the State is taken on record.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. Perused the case dairy and other materials on record.
2
5. The other accused persons are on bail. Taking note of this fact, I am of the view that the benefit under Section 482 of the BNSS can be extended in favour of the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.
7. I direct that, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer, and shall also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, and on the further condition that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once a week and shall not leave the jurisdiction of the concerned police station until submission of the charge-sheet.
8. Thus, the application for anticipatory bail being C.R.M. (A) 2274 of 2026 stands disposed of.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)