Calcutta High Court
CO/294/2026 of UTTAM BANERJEE Vs MALAY KUMAR BANERJEE @ BANDHAPARDHYAY AND ANR. on 28 August 2026
Ct. No. 21 Sl No. 1. ASR CO/294/2026 UTTAM BANERJEE VS MALAY KUMAR BANERJEE @ BANDHAPARDHYAY AND ANR. Mr. Younus Sultan …For the Appellant The learned Advocate on record representing the petitioner submits that the impugned order dated 20th January, 2026 is against the said temporary
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
28.8.2026 Ct. No. 21
Sl No. 1. ASR
CO/294/2026 UTTAM BANERJEE VS MALAY KUMAR BANERJEE @ BANDHAPARDHYAY AND ANR.
Mr. Younus Sultan
…For the Appellant
The learned Advocate on record representing the petitioner submits that the impugned order dated 20th January, 2026 is against the said temporary injunction been allowed the petitioner has preferred the present revisional application.
Subsequently, with the passage of time the present revisional application has become infructuous as such the petitioner does not intend to proceed with the present revisional application. In support of his contention the learned Advocate has provided a mail dated 26th August, 2026.
Let the copy of the mail be kept with the record.
As the petitioner does not intend to proceed with the present civil revisional application which has become infructuous, so the matter is being dismissed.
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J)