Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/2340/2026 of GOLAM NABI MANDAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 27 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Sl. No.27 Ct. 446/tkm C. R. M. ( A ) 2340 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Baduria Police Station Case No.231 of 2026 dated 18.05.2026 under sections 329(3)/118(2)/109/351(2)/3(5) of BNSS

27.08.2026

Sl. No.27

Ct. 446/tkm

C. R. M. (A) 2340 of 2026

In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Baduria Police Station Case No.231 of 2026 dated 18.05.2026 under sections 329(3)/118(2)/109/351(2)/3(5) of BNSS 2023

And

In Re: Golam Nabi Mandal

… … Petitioner

Allowed

Mr. Kallal Kr. Basu

Mr. Jamat Ul Firdous

Ms. Pramita Banerjee

… … for the petitioner

Mr. Suman Agarwal

… … for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case. Some of the co- accused persons are on bail. In such circumstances, according to him, the benefit under Section 482 of the BNSS can be extended in favour of the petitioner.

2. Learned Advocate for the State produces the case diary, memo of evidence and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

3. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties and perused the materials in the case diary, including the injury report. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and, on further consideration that the incident allegedly occurred in the presence of direct evidence, I am of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary and that the privilege under Section 482 of the BNSS can be extended in favour of the petitioner.

4. Accordingly, I direct that, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-

2 (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM Basirhat, North 24 Pgs. and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.

5. The application being CRM (A) 2340 of 2026 is disposed of.

(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead