Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/2230/2026 of AMILADDIN SARKAR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 24 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Ct. No 446 Jayanta Allowed CRM ( A ) 2230 of 2026 Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with the Harirampur Police Station case no.177 of 2026 dated 19.05.2026 under Sections

24.08.2026

Ct. No 446

Jayanta

Allowed

CRM (A) 2230 of 2026

Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with the Harirampur Police Station case no.177 of 2026 dated 19.05.2026

under Sections 115(2)/126(2)/74/351(3)/3/16(2)/318(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

In the matter of : AMILADDIN SARKAR

….. petitioner

Adv. J. Rudra

Adv. S. Banerjee

…. For the Petitioner.

Adv. Sanmuk Bera

Adv. A. Pandey

…. For the State.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Parties are present through their respective Counsels.

2. Mr. Rudra, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, submits that the Petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the two other accused persons are on bail. In such circumstances, according to him, the present Petitioner may also be granted anticipatory bail.

3. Learned Counsel appearing for the State produces the C.D. and other materials, including the Memo of Evidence.

4. The incident allegedly occurred in the presence of direct witnesses, and the other accused persons are on bail. No injury report is available in the C.D.

5. Considering these aspects, I am of the view that the custodial interrogation of the present Petitioner is not warranted and the benefit under Section 482 of the BNSS can be extended in favour of the present Petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

6. In the event of arrest, the petitioner, namely, AMILADDIN SARKAR, shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, and shall also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023, and on further conditions that the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and shall not threaten or intimidate the witnesses. The petitioner shall meet the I.O. once a week till submission of the report in final form.

7. The application for anticipatory bail being CRM (A) 2230 of 2026, is thus, disposed of.

8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, duly applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead