Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/2250/2026 of BIKRAM SAHOO @ BIKRAMJIT SAHOO Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 24 August 2026
Ct. No 446 Jayanta Allowed CRM ( A ) 2250 of 2026 In the matter of : BIKRAM SAHOO @ BIKRAMJIT SAHOO ….. petitioner Adv. Y. Maity …. For the Petitioner. Adv. Kaustav Sharma Adv. H. Jaiswal …. For the State. 1. Parties are present through their respective Counsels. 2. Mr.
28
24.08.2026
Ct. No 446
Jayanta
Allowed
CRM (A) 2250 of 2026
In the matter of : BIKRAM SAHOO @ BIKRAMJIT SAHOO
….. petitioner
Adv. Y. Maity
…. For the Petitioner.
Adv. Kaustav Sharma
Adv. H. Jaiswal
…. For the State.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Parties are present through their respective Counsels.
2. Mr. Maity, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner does not want to press this instant application.
3. In view of such submission made on behalf of the petitioner, the application for anticipatory bail stands dismissed as not pressed.
4. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, duly applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)