Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/2194/2026 of DEBNATH MUKHERJEE Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 24 August 2026
In The High Court at Calcutta Sl. No. 7 Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Court No. 446 Appellate Side Moumita CRM ( A ) 2194 of 2026 Debnath Mukherjee Vs. The State of West Bengal Mr. Lokesh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Tatini Sengupta, Adv. ….For the State 1. The petitioner is not represented.
24.08.2026
In The High Court at Calcutta
Sl. No. 7
Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction
Court No. 446
Appellate Side
Moumita
CRM (A) 2194 of 2026
Debnath Mukherjee
Vs.
The State of West Bengal
Mr. Lokesh Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Tatini Sengupta, Adv.
….For the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner is not represented.
2. Learned Advocate appearing for the State produces a memo of arrest and submits that, during the pendency of the present application for anticipatory bail, the petitioner has been arrested.The memo of arrest as placed is taken on record.
3. In view thereof, the application for anticipatory bail stands dismissed as infructuous.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)