Calcutta High Court
CPAN/891/2026 of ASISH JANA Vs SUDARSHAN MAITY, PRADHAN LAKSHYA II, GRAM PANCHAYET on 24 August 2026
24.08.2026 Court. No. 12 GB CPAN 891 of 2026 In WPA 9407 of 2023 Asish Jana Vs. Sudarshan Maity Mr. Jayanta Samanta, Mr. Karunamoyee Samanta, Ms. Satabdi Bhattacharya, Mr. Riddhi Naskar … for the Applicant. Mr. Raj Kumar Sain … for the Alleged Contemnor. 1. The order of this
Item No.21
24.08.2026
Court. No. 12
GB
CPAN 891 of 2026
In
WPA 9407 of 2023
Asish Jana
Vs.
Sudarshan Maity
Mr. Jayanta Samanta,
Mr. Karunamoyee Samanta,
Ms. Satabdi Bhattacharya,
Mr. Riddhi Naskar
… for the Applicant.
Mr. Raj Kumar Sain
… for the Alleged Contemnor.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The order of this Court has been complied with. The reasoned order passed by the concerned gram panchayat indicates that the disputed pucca structure had been erected without any building plan and, as such, the matter has been referred to the Sub-Divisional Officer under Section 23(5) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973. The documents are kept on record.
2. Accordingly, the contempt application is disposed of. Contempt proceeding is dropped.
3. It is expected that the Sub-Divisional Officer will act and proceed in accordance with law and expeditiously.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)