Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/2199/2026 of DAYAMOY MONDAL AND ANR. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 21 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Sl. No. 25 Ct. No. 446 SG [ALLOWED] C. R. M. ( A ) 2199 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Dholahat Police Station Case No. 375/2025 dated 04.06.2025 under Sections 137(2)/87/64(2)(m)/65(1) of

21.08.2026

Sl. No. 25

Ct. No. 446

SG

[ALLOWED]

C. R. M. (A) 2199 of 2026

In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Dholahat Police Station Case No. 375/2025 dated 04.06.2025 under Sections 137(2)/87/64(2)(m)/65(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 6(i) of the POCSO

Act read with Section 9/10/11 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.

And

In Re: Dayamoy Mondal & Anr.

… … Petitioners

Mr. Partha Sarathi Mondal.

… for the petitioners

Mr. Amitava Karmakar,

Ms. Deblina Bhattacharjee.

… for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. Mondal, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners, submits that the principal accused is on bail and that the charge sheet has been submitted. The present petitioners are the father and elder sister, respectively, of the principal accused, and there is no specific allegation against them. He submits that, in view of these facts, the benefit under Section 482 of the BNSS can be extended in favour of the petitioners.

2. Mr. Karmakar, learned Advocate appearing for the State produces the case diary and memorandum of evidence and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

3. The memorandum of evidence as placed is taken on record.

2

4. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties and perused the case diary and other materials available on record. The charge sheet has been submitted and the principal accused is on bail. There is no specific allegation against the present petitioners. Taking note of this aspect, I am of the view that the benefit under Section 482 of the BNSS can be extended in favour of the petitioners.

5. In view of the above, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

6. Accordingly, I direct that, in the event of arrest, the petitioners, viz., (1) Dayamoy Mondal and (2) Sharbani Mondal be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kakdwip, Soutth 24 Parganas and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

7. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead