Calcutta High Court

MAT/528/2026 of The Director General Central Reserve Police Force CRPF and Anr Vs Rumjan Ali on 21 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No.04 B.K.N M.A.T. 528 of 2026 The Director General, Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), (Recruitment Board) & Anr. Vs. Rumjan Ali & Ors. Mr. Ranjan Kr. Sinha, Mr. Shaunak Ghosh … for the Appellant. Mr. Debasish Kundu, Mr. Bidan Modak … for the Private

S/L 28

21.08.2026

Court No.04

B.K.N

M.A.T. 528 of 2026

The Director General, Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), (Recruitment Board) & Anr.

Vs.

Rumjan Ali & Ors.

Mr. Ranjan Kr. Sinha,

Mr. Shaunak Ghosh

… for the Appellant.

Mr. Debasish Kundu,

Mr. Bidan Modak

… for the Private Respondent.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The learned advocate for the appellant submits that he will make the necessary corrections in terms of the office report in the memorandum of appeal during course of the day.

2. According to the learned advocate for the Union of India/Appellants, the Apex Court in the case of Union of India & Ors. Vs. Atul Kumar Verma & Ors. in Civil Appeal No(s) 4423-4426/2026 SLP (C) Nos. 13390-13393/2026 and Diary No. 68753/2025 has already settled the controversy pending in the present case.

3. As per decision of the Apex Court, a candidate who participated in the process of recruitment of constables (GD) in the force and his height if found/measured as 169.5 centimetres and above, then 0.5 would have to be ignored and 169.5 and more would have to be rounded off to the next higher centimetre. Such candidate

2 cannot be disqualified on ground of less height, if they are 169.5 centimetres or above.

4. The Hon’ble Apex Court passed such order in an appeal in identical circumstances as arising for consideration in the present case.

5. The learned advocate for the appellants fairly submits that applying the same law since the writ petitioner was not found to be below 169.5 cm. as against the requisite minimum height of 170 cm. during his height measurement, therefore, nothing survives in the present appeal.

6. Since the appeal has become infructuous in view of the above noted decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court, the same is accordingly disposed of.

7. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J.)

(Partha Pratim Roy, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead