Calcutta High Court

FMA/942/2024 of W.B. BOARD OF PRIMARY EDU. Vs MRINAL BARIK AND ORS on 20 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026 (D/L No.25-26) Ct. No.4 (SKB) F.M.A. 1195 of 2024 With CAN 1 of 2024 CAN 2 of 2024 CAN 3 of 2024 State of West Bengal and others Versus Mrinal Barik and others With F.M.A. 942 of 2024 With CAN 1 of 2024 West Bengal Board of Primary Education Versus Mrinal Barik and others Mr. Subir

20th August, 2026

(D/L No.25-26)

Ct. No.4

(SKB)

F.M.A. 1195 of 2024

With

CAN 1 of 2024

CAN 2 of 2024

CAN 3 of 2024

State of West Bengal and others

Versus

Mrinal Barik and others

With

F.M.A. 942 of 2024

With

CAN 1 of 2024

West Bengal Board of Primary Education

Versus

Mrinal Barik and others

Mr. Subir Sanyal, Sr. Adv.,

Mr. Ratul Biswas,

Mr. Kaushik Chowdhury

… for the W.B.B.P.E.

Mr. Sahasrangshu Bhattacharjee, ld. AGP, Mr. Arghya Chatterjee … for the State.

Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee,

Mr. Imtiaz Akhtar,

Mr. Badrul Karim

… for the respondents

in FMA 1195 of 2024.

Re: FMA 942 of 2024

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. Sanyal, leaned senior advocate, appearing on behalf of the appellant has handed over a copy of the Office Memorandum dated 21.01.2026 bearing Memo No.102/B/APT/PC issued by the Chairman, Kolkata Primary School

2 Council, and submitted that the appellant has already been offered an appointment under OBC-‘B’ category.

2. There is no dispute that the grievance of the writ petitioner/respondent, so far as appointment is concerned, stands redressed. In view of this situation, the appeal at the instance of the West Bengal Board of Primary Education is disposed of.

3. Accordingly, all connected applications stand disposed of.

Re: FMA 1195 of 2024

4. In so far as the aforesaid appeal is concerned, the learned advocate for the appellants submits that the same is required to be considered on merits.

5. As prayed for, list this matter under the same heading on 17th September, 2026.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J.)

(Partha Pratim Roy, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead