Calcutta High Court

WPA/7210/2026 of KARUNA NASKAR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Item no.17 Subrata Bhattacharyya AR(C) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA No.7210 of 2026 In the matter of : Karuna Naskar …. Petitioner -vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. ….Respondents For the petitioner: Mr. Tamal

19-08-2026

Item no.17

Subrata

Bhattacharyya

AR(C)

In the High Court at Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

Case No.

WPA No.7210 of 2026

In the matter of :

Karuna Naskar

…. Petitioner

-vs-

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

….Respondents

For the petitioner:

Mr. Tamal Taru Panda

….Advocate

For the State:

Ms. Chandreyi Alam, AGP

Ms. Runu Mukherjee

….Advocates

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record.

2. The petitioner was serving as an Assisting Teacher in a secondary school and she retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on January 31, 2021.

3. She prays for granting permission to refund the Government’s share of contribution in his provident fund account along with interest and additional interest so that she can switch over to the pension scheme.

4. Reliance has been placed on the judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Division Bench on 26th July, 2023 in MAT 146 of 2019 (State of West Bengal & Ors. vs. Muktimoyee Pal (Dey) & Ors.) wherein the Court held that the teacher is not required to exercise fresh option but get the benefit of pension if the Government’s share

Page 2 of contribution in his provident fund account is refunded along with interest and additional interest.

5. The petitioner claims that option was exercised in terms of ROPA 1990. She is willing to refund the contributory provident fund amount with interest and additional interest to avail the benefit of pension.

6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition stands disposed of by directing the DI of Schools (SE), Purba Medinipur to calculate the amount refunded by the petitioner to avail the pension scheme within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order. If the petitioner refunds the calculated amount within a period of two weeks from the date of receiving the statement of refund, then the DI of Schools shall forward the pension papers of the petitioner to the office of the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance who will thereafter issue fresh PPO in favour of the petitioner after verification of all records within a period of eight weeks thereafter.

7. While computing the interest the authority shall take into consideration Clause (iv) of the notification no. 749- SE(L)/SL/5S-56/13(Pt-V) dated 13th June, 2014. The pension will be payable on and from the date of superannuation of the petitioner.

8. The writ petition stands disposed of.

9. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. [Amrita Sinha, J]

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead