Calcutta High Court

WPA/8280/2026 of TAPAN KUMAR MANDAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 17 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No.24 SD IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION WPA 8280 of 2026 Tapan Kumar Mandal Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury Ms. Pritha Biswas Ms. Upasana Sarkar … for the Petitioner. Ms. Mary Datta Ms. Aparajita Mitra …

S/L 16

17.08.2026

Court No.24

SD

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION

WPA 8280 of 2026

Tapan Kumar Mandal

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury

Ms. Pritha Biswas

Ms. Upasana Sarkar

… for the Petitioner.

Ms. Mary Datta

Ms. Aparajita Mitra

… for the State.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today be kept with the records.

2. The petitioner is serving as Assistant Teacher of a high school. He alleges that he has not been paid due remuneration for the period from December 9, 2024 to April 3, 2025. His annual increment as was due on July 1, 2025, has also not disbursed.

3. The representation of the petitioner to the District Inspector of Schools (SE), Paschim Medinipur is pending consideration for more than a year.

4. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that he would be covered by the order passed in a similar matter on November 10, 2025 in MAT 1561 of 2025 [Ramsankar Giri vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.].

5. Without entering into the merits of the claim of the petitioner as it appears that a representation of the petitioner is pending consideration at the end of the

2 authority, accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of by directing the District Inspector of Schools (SE), Paschim Medinipur to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation received on June 13, 2025 strictly in accordance with law upon perusal of the documents submitted by the petitioner in support of his claim and in line with the order passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench in the matter of Ramsankar Giri (supra) at the earliest, but positively within a period of twelve weeks from the date of communication of this order.

6. If the prayer of the petitioner is allowed, then necessary consequential steps shall be taken by the authority without any further delay.

7. Learned advocate for the petitioner is directed to forward a copy of the subject representation dated June 13, 2025 along with all other supporting documents to the aforesaid respondent at the time of communicating the order of the Court.

8. The writ petition stands disposed of.

9. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Amrita Sinha, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead