Calcutta High Court

WPA/2064/2024 of MD ALI ABRAR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 17 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Item no.D/L 47 Court No. 24 Pradip, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA 2064 of 2024 In the matter of : Md. Ali Abrar …. Petitioner VS. The State of West Bengal & Ors. ….Respondents For the Petitioner: Mr. Anish

17.08.2026

Item no.D/L 47

Court No. 24

Pradip, A.R.(Ct.)

In the High Court at Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

Case No.

WPA 2064 of 2024

In the matter of:

Md. Ali Abrar

…. Petitioner

VS.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

….Respondents

For the Petitioner:

Mr. Anish Roy

Mr. Syed Murshid Alam

Ms. Reshma Khatun

Mr. Danial Hossain

Mr. Subrata Ghosh

Mr. Prasenjit Das

….Advocates

For the State:

Mr. Lokenath Chatterjee

Ms. Sneha Chatterjee

….Advocates

For the Respondent nos. 5-6:

Mr. Saswata Bhattacharyya

Mr. Iswar Chandra Maiti

….Advocates

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The petitioner seeks twenty years’ service benefit.

2. Learned advocate representing the school has filed a report wherefrom it appears that there are several allegations against the petitioner starting from financial irregularity, sexual harassment and others.

3. The allegations against the petitioner are being investigated. An investigation officer has also been engaged and a date of hearing was fixed and intimated to the petitioner for attending the investigation procedure.

4. There is nothing on record to show whether the investigation is over or not and whether any final order has been passed.

Page 2

5. Till the petitioner is able to come out clean of the allegations leveled against him, the relief sought for by the petitioner cannot be allowed.

6. The District Inspector of Schools, Secondary Education, Howrah is directed to take prompt necessary steps to ensure that the investigation procedure against the petitioner is concluded at the earliest but positively within a period of ninety days from the date of communication of this order.

7. Necessary consequential steps in accordance with law shall be taken by the District Inspector of Schools, Secondary Education, Howrah without any further delay.

8. The writ petition stands disposed of.

9. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

10. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Amrita Sinha, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead