Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/2222/2026 of MD SAMIR AND ANR. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 17 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Ct. No. 446 Sl. No.55 akd [ALLOWED] C. R. M. ( A ) 2222 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed on 08.07.2026 in connection with Islampur Police Station Case No. 306 of 2026 dated 02.04.2026 under Sections

17.08.2026

Ct. No. 446

Sl. No.55

akd

[ALLOWED]

C. R. M. (A) 2222 of 2026

In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed on 08.07.2026 in connection with Islampur Police Station Case No. 306 of 2026 dated 02.04.2026 under Sections 109/115(2)/117(2)/329(3)/351(3)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. (G.R. Case No. 898 of 2026)

And

In Re: Md. Samir

… … Petitioner

Mr. Sourav Mondal

Mr. M. Nazar Chowdhury

Mr. Farheen Rais

Mr. Rony Mondal

Mr. Arijit Bhuiya

… … for the petitioner

Mr. Parmanand Sharma .. ld. Addl. Public Prosecutor Mr. Radhey Shyam Tiwari … … for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This is an application for anticipatory bail filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Islampur Police Station Case No. 306 of 2026 dated 02.04.2026 under Sections 109/115(2)/117(2)/329(3)/351(3)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, following a dispute arising over a piece of land, the incident occurred. There was a free fight between two groups of people. He further submits that there is a counter-case, being Islampur Police Station Case No. 307 of 2026 dated 2nd April, 2026. Accordingly, he submits that custodial interrogation of the present petitioner is not necessary.

2

3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor produces the case diary and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner on the basis of the materials available therein.

4. Heard the learned Advocates appearing for both the parties and perused the case diary as well as the other materials on record.

5. Record reveals that charge-sheet vide No. 378 of 2026 dated 31st May, 2026, has been submitted. There is a case and counter-case between the parties. The incident allegedly occurred in the presence of direct evidence. Noting these facts, I am of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary and that he may be granted anticipatory bail.

6. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the accused/petitioner, namely, Md. Samir, be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Islampur, Uttar Dinajpur and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

7. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead