Calcutta High Court
WPCRC/161/2026 of SUKUMAR BAIDYA Vs ANJAN GHOSH WBCS SDO DIAMOND HARBOUR SUB DIVISION on 17 August 2026
Court. No. 12 Cp WPCRC/161/2026 in WPA/9401/2024 SUKUMAR BAIDYA VS AYAN DUTTA GUPTA Mr. Prabir Maji … for the Applicant. Ms. Susmita Saha Dutta Mr. Niladri Saha ….for the alleged contemnor. The alleged contemnor is present in court. Admittedly, the alleged contemnor has
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Item No.13 17.08.2026 Court. No. 12
Cp
WPCRC/161/2026 in WPA/9401/2024
SUKUMAR BAIDYA VS AYAN DUTTA GUPTA
Mr. Prabir Maji … for the Applicant.
Ms. Susmita Saha Dutta Mr. Niladri Saha ….for the alleged contemnor.
The alleged contemnor is present in court. Admittedly, the alleged contemnor has passed an order of demolition. The persons aggrieved by the said order have preferred a statutory appeal. Under such circumstances, nothing remains to be decided in the contempt application. Accordingly, the contempt proceedings are dropped and the contempt application is disposed of. The Rule is discharged. The applicant will be at liberty to take steps as may be available in law once the appeal is disposed of. It is expected that the appeal shall be disposed of expeditiously and adequate steps shall be taken, strictly in accordance with law.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)