Calcutta High Court

MAT/1359/2026 of MANAS KABI Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 14 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No. 12 Item No.01 Cp MAT 1359 of 2026 With CAN 1 of 2026 Manas Kabi Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharya Mr. Subhrangsu Panda Mr. Sumitava Chakraborty Mr. H. Roy Mr. Anupam Singha …..for the appellant. Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya, Ld. AAG Mr. Rajdeep

14.08.2026

Court No. 12

Item No.01

Cp

MAT 1359 of 2026

With

CAN 1 of 2026

Manas Kabi

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharya

Mr. Subhrangsu Panda

Mr. Sumitava Chakraborty

Mr. H. Roy

Mr. Anupam Singha

…..for the appellant.

Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya, Ld. AAG

Mr. Rajdeep Mantha

Ms. Shetparna Ray

….for the State.

Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee

……for the respondent no. 6.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. It is informed to us by Mr. Bhattacharya, learned advocate for the appellant, that the money has been paid to the respondent no. 6 who was the complainant before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

2. Mr. Chatterjee, learned advocate for the respondent no. 6, accepts such contention and submits that the money has been paid from the personal account of the Accountant.

2

3. Under such circumstances, as the payment had been made, the warrant of arrest issued by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission stands recalled.

4. The order impugned is set aside.

5. The point of law urged by Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya, learned Additional Advocate General is left open and will be decided in an appropriate case.

6. We are not inclined to decide any other issues which are pending before the Commission. The copy of the order impugned is taken on record. The receipt and the forwarding message indicating payment are also kept on record.

7. Accordingly, the appeal and the connected application are disposed of.

8. Parties are directed to act on the basis of the server copy of this order.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)

(Arjun Ray Mukherjee, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead