Calcutta High Court

WPA(P)/362/2026 of SUBHAS NAYEK AND ANR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 12 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Item No.22 Court No.01 KCP WPA(P) 362 of 2026 Subhas Nayek & Anr. - Versus - The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Robiul Islam Mr. Soham Banerjee …. For the petitioners Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya, Ld. A.A.G. Mr. Anish Kumar Mukherjee Mr. Aditya Mondal …. For the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

12.08.2026 Item No.22 Court No.01 KCP WPA(P) 362 of 2026

Subhas Nayek & Anr.

- Versus - The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Robiul Islam Mr. Soham Banerjee …. For the petitioners

Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya, Ld. A.A.G. Mr. Anish Kumar Mukherjee Mr. Aditya Mondal …. For the State respondents

Mr. Debabrata Saha Roy, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pingal Bhattacharyya Mr. Avidipta Paul

…for the respondent no.8

The present Public Interest Litigation (in short, PIL) has been preferred praying for issuance of necessary direction upon the respondents to quash and set aside the allotment/dealership granted in favour of the private respondent. Heard Mr. Islam, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Pingal Bhattacharyya, learned advocate appearing for the respondent no.8. In course of hearing, Mr. Bhattacharyya, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the State authorities submits that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed inasmuch as necessary proceedings for revocation of the FPS licence of the respondent no.8 bearing FPS Code No.WB0343454446 and Licence No.34345423453 has already been initiated and the entire process for revocation of the FPS licence would be

2 completed preferably within a period of eight weeks. Let the memo dated 11th August, 2026, as placed, be kept on record. Copies of the same have been handed over to Mr. Islam and Mr. Pingal Bhattacharyya. In view thereof, no further interference is called for in the present writ petition and the same is, accordingly, disposed of. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Atarup Banerjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, A.C.J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead