Calcutta High Court
WP.ST/114/2026 of SWAPAN KUMAR GHOSH Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 12 August 2026
Court No.04 B.K.N W.P.S.T. 114 of 2026 Dr. Swapan Kumar Ghosh Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Manali Biswas, Mrs. Ina Bhattacharyya … for the Petitioner. Ms. Shraboni Sarkar, Ms. Umme Habiba Khatun, … for the P.S.C, W.B. Mr. S. K. Bhattacharyya, Ms. S. Burman
S/L 18
12.08.2026
Court No.04
B.K.N
W.P.S.T. 114 of 2026
Dr. Swapan Kumar Ghosh
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Ms. Manali Biswas,
Mrs. Ina Bhattacharyya
… for the Petitioner.
Ms. Shraboni Sarkar,
Ms. Umme Habiba Khatun,
… for the P.S.C, W.B.
Mr. S. K. Bhattacharyya,
Ms. S. Burman
… for the A.G. Bengal.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard the learned advocate for the writ petitioner/applicant.
2. The petitioner approached the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal (for short ‘Tribunal’) for granting pensionary benefits. The Tribunal vide order dated 23.12.2024 directed for the benefits being granted in the following terms: “Having heard the submissions and after considering the new development in the light of the correspondence mentioned above, the Respondent Nos. 9 & 10, the Medical Superintendent-cum-Vice Principal, Murshidabad Medical College and Hospital and the Superintendent, District Hospital, Berhampore, Murshidabad, respectively are directed to ensure proposal for pension and other retiral benefits are completed and submitted before the Principal Accountant General (A&E), West Bengal within a period of sixty (60) days from the date of communication of this order.
Accordingly, this application is disposed of.”
3. The order dated 23.12.2024 is challenged before this Court; wherein a submission is made that respondents
2 did not comply with the order till date, as all dues were not paid.
4. Such submission cannot be looked into in this proceeding wherein the order (dated 23.12.2024), non compliance of which is alleged, is put to challenge.
5. If there is any grievance in this regard, it is open to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
6. The writ petition is dismissed with such liberty.
7. Urgent Photostat Certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all necessary formalities.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J.)
(Partha Pratim Roy, J.)