Calcutta High Court
WPA/19839/2026 of PARTHA SARATHI MANDAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 6 August 2026
Item no.D/L 12 Court No. 24 Pradip, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA 19839 of 2026 In the matter of : Partha Sarathi Mandal …. Petitioner VS. The State of West Bengal & Ors. ….Respondents For the Petitioner:
06.08.2026
Item no.D/L 12
Court No. 24
Pradip, A.R.(Ct.)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Case No.
WPA 19839 of 2026
In the matter of:
Partha Sarathi Mandal
…. Petitioner
VS.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
….Respondents
For the Petitioner:
Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy
Ms. Susmita Mondal
….Advocates
For the State:
Mr. Sahasrangshu Bhattacharjee, Ld. AGP
Mr. Jagannath Chatterjee
….Advocates
For the WBBSE:
Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharyya
Mr. Bibek Dutta
Mr. Manas Bhattacharyya
….Advocates
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the illegal act of the administrator of the school in restraining him from joining duties after he obtained bail in connection with a criminal case which is pending against him.
3. Learned advocate representing the Board submits, upon instruction that yesterday, that is, on 5th August, 2026 a formal order of suspension has been issued against the petitioner. The petitioner would be entitled to receive his subsistence allowance in accordance with law during his period of suspension.
4. In view of the order of suspension passed by the Board on 5th August, 2026, the order of suspension passed on 16th June, 2026 by the administrator of the school loses its relevance.
Page 2
5. As it appears that the petitioner has already been put under suspension, accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner to permit him to resume duty cannot be allowed.
6. The writ petition stands disposed of.
7. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
8. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)