Calcutta High Court

WPA/20574/2025 of SRI KALIPADA PATRA Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 5 August 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

05.08.2026 Court No.24 pg. IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 20574 of 2025 Kalipada Patra -versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Sudipa Banerjee … For the Petitioner 1. Affidavit- of -service filed in Court today is taken on record.

ML-1125

05.08.2026

Court No.24

pg.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

WPA 20574 of 2025

Kalipada Patra

-versus

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Ms. Sudipa Banerjee

… For the Petitioner

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Affidavit-of-service filed in Court today is taken on record.

2. The petitioner was an Assistant Teacher of a High School. He retired from service on 30.04.2014. The Pension Payment Order was issued in favour of the petitioner on 24.09.2014.

3. The petitioner prays for interest on account of the delayed payment of the terminal benefits.

4. In the present case it is noticed that the petitioner has approached this Court long after the Pension Payment Order was issued and payment made in accordance with the same.

5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Union of India –vs- Tarsem Singh reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 clearly laid down that insofar as consequential relief of recovery of arrear for the past period is concerned, relief shall be restricted only to a period of three years prior to the filing of the writ petition or from the date of demand made by the petitioner.

6. In the instant case the petitioner did not raise any demand before the respondents praying for release of interest on account of delay in making payment. The petitioner directly approached this Court praying for interest, that too, long after the PPO was issued.

2

7. In view of the above, the Court is not inclined to exercise jurisdiction in the matter and grant any relief in favour of the petitioner.

8. The writ petition is dismissed.

9. All parties shall act on the basis of a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

10. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Amrita Sinha, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead