Calcutta High Court
WPA/27119/2025 of GOUTAM CHAKRABORTY Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 5 August 2026
Item no.M/L 1151 Court No. 24 Pradip, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA 27119 of 2025 In the matter of : Goutam Chakraborty …. Petitioner VS. The State of West Bengal & Ors. ….Respondents For the Petitioner:
05.08.2026
Item no.M/L 1151
Court No. 24
Pradip, A.R.(Ct.)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Case No.
WPA 27119 of 2025
In the matter of:
Goutam Chakraborty
…. Petitioner
VS.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
….Respondents
For the Petitioner:
Ms. Jonaki Saha
….Advocate
For the State:
Mr. Madhu Jana
Mr. Subhajit Das
….Advocates
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavits of service filed in Court today are taken on record.
2. The petitioner retired on 30.09.2024 on attaining his normal age of superannuation. Pension Payment Order was issued in his favour on 03.10.2024. Prior thereto, the petitioner was directed to deposit a sum of Rs.2,45,489/- on account of refund of overdrawal payment which the petitioner did by a Treasury Challan dated 12.09.2024.
3. In the instant writ petition the petitioner prays for refund of the aforesaid overdrawn amount.
4. It has been submitted that the said amount could not have been directed to be refunded on account of excess payment immediately prior to the retirement of the teacher.
5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of State of Punjab & Ors. Vs. Rafiq Masih (White Washer) & Ors. reported in (2015) 4 SCC 334 laid down that recovery from retired employees and recovery from employees who are due to retire within one year of the order of recovery is impermissible.
Page 2
6. In the instant case, the petitioner has been directed to refund the amount immediately prior to his retirement. The same could not have been done.
7. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, the concerned District Inspector of Schools and the concerned Treasury Officer to refund to the petitioner the aforesaid amount along with interest @ 6% per annum calculated from the date of issuance of the Pension Payment Order till date of actual payment at the earliest but positively within a period of twelve weeks from the date of communication of this order.
8. The writ petition stands disposed of.
9. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
10. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)