Calcutta High Court
WPA/18768/2026 of RUPSA GANGULY Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. on 31 July 2026
2026 Item no.D/L 03 Court No. 24 Pradip, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA 18768 of 2026 In the matter of : Rupsa Ganguly …. Petitioner VS. Union of India & Ors. ….Respondents For the Petitioner: Mr. Rabi
31ST JULY, 2026
Item no.D/L 03
Court No. 24
Pradip, A.R.(Ct.)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Case No.
WPA 18768 of 2026
In the matter of:
Rupsa Ganguly
…. Petitioner
VS.
Union of India & Ors.
….Respondents
For the Petitioner:
Mr. Rabi Shankar Chattopadhyay
Mr. Imteaz Ahmed
Mr. Sayan Chattopadhyay
Mr. Rokon Ali Molla
….Advocates
For the Union of India:
Mr. Uttam Basak
….Advocate
For the Respondent no. 2:
Ms. Amrita Pandey
….Advocate
For the NTA:
Mr. U.S. Menon
Mr. Abhirup Chakraborty
….Advocates
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record.
2. The petitioner participated in NEET-UG, 2026. She alleges that her answer sheet has not been evaluated properly. Further allegation is that three score cards have been issued by the authority in respect of the self same candidate.
3. Learned advocate represented the National Testing Agency raises the allegation of forgery against the petitioner. It has been submitted that the documents annexed to the writ petition are all forged and doctored. The score card which the petitioner is relying upon annexed at Page-118 of the writ petition is the score card for the
Page 2
NEET-UG, 2025 and not for the year 2026. The OMR annexed to the writ petition is also forged.
4. Prima facie, upon hearing the submissions made on behalf of all the parties and on perusal of the documents annexed to the writ petition, it appears that the petitioner has indeed annexed documents of the examination conducted last year and has simply tried to confuse the authority as well as the Court. Such action of the candidate is highly improper.
5. The Court is not inclined to exercise jurisdiction in the matter. The writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed.
6. It will be open for the respondents to take steps in the matter in accordance with law.
7. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
8. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)