Calcutta High Court

WPCRC/166/2026 of SK MAKBUL AND ANR Vs DEBABRATA SARKAR EXECUTIVE ENGINEER EAST MEDINIPUR DIVISION IRRIGATION AND WATERWAYS DIRECTORATE on 31 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026. MNS. WPCRC 166 of 2026 in WPA No. 13850 of 2023 Sk. Makbul Ahmed and another Vs. Mr. Debabrata Sarkar Mr. Rahul Deb Goenka …for the petitioners. Mrs. Indrani Chakraborty, Ms. Soma Chakraborty, Advs. …for the alleged contemnor. 1. From the compliance report filed by the

D/L.1.

July 31, 2026.

MNS.

WPCRC 166 of 2026

in

WPA No. 13850 of 2023

Sk. Makbul Ahmed and another

Vs.

Mr. Debabrata Sarkar

Mr. Rahul Deb Goenka

…for the petitioners.

Mrs. Indrani Chakraborty,

Ms. Soma Chakraborty, Advs.

…for the alleged contemnor.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. From the compliance report filed by the alleged contemnor dated July 24, 2026, it transpires that, pursuant to the order of this Court dated April 4, 2024 passed in WPA No. 13850 of 2023, the alleged contemnor has, upon giving appropriate hearing to the interested parties and on the basis of the materials before him, disposed of the representation given by the writ petitioners and, upon conclusion of the proceeding, has passed a final order dated May 27, 2025, directing removal of the unauthorized constructions on the subject property.

2. However, during preparation and execution of the demolition order, the Sub-Divisional Officer inspected the site and found that the unauthorized structures were connected with live electrical installations and consequently the Station Manager, WBSEDCL, Panskura

2 Power Station was requested to disconnect the electricity supply to facilitate safe demolition.

3. From the compliance report, it further transpires that in the meantime the private respondents have preferred Appeal Case No. 18(AO) of 2025 under Section 7 of the West Bengal Public Land (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1962 before the District Magistrate, Purba Medinipur, challenging the order dated May 27, 2025 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate.

4. In the said appeal, an interim order has also been passed and the appeal is pending for adjudication.

5. Thus, upon perusal of the said report, it is evident that the alleged contemnor had fully complied with the order of this Court to the best of his ability.

6. The subsistence of an interim order passed in appeal operates as an impediment to the alleged contemnor to proceed with the demolition of the unauthorized structures and as such, the alleged contemnor cannot be made liable for the same.

7. Thus, in view of the order-in-question having been complied with, WPCRC 166 of 2026 stands discharged and CPAN 742 of 2025 stands disposed of.

8. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of due formalities. . (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead