Calcutta High Court

WPA/18614/2026 of KAKALI SINHA AND ORS Vs THE MISSION DIRECTOR, PBRSSM, GOVERNMENT OF WEST BENGAL on 30 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

2026 Item no.D/L 06 Court No. 24 Pradip, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA 18614 of 2026 In the matter of : Kakali Sinha & Ors. …. Petitioner VS. The Mission Director, Paschim Banga Rajya Shishu Shiksha Mission,

30TH JULY, 2026

Item no.D/L 06

Court No. 24

Pradip, A.R.(Ct.)

In the High Court at Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

Case No.

WPA 18614 of 2026

In the matter of:

Kakali Sinha & Ors.

…. Petitioner

VS.

The Mission Director, Paschim Banga Rajya Shishu Shiksha Mission, Government of West Bengal

….Respondent

For the Petitioner:

Mr. Bidhan Biswas

Mr. Subhajit Purkait

….Advocates

For the Mission Director:

Mr. Md. Sarwar Jahan

Ms. Mousumi Mitra

Ms. Sahina Parvin

….Advocates

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Affidavit of service and the receipt showing submission of deficit court fees filed in Court today are taken on record.

2. The petitioners were initially serving as Sahayak/Sahayika in Shishu Shiksha Kendra. They exercised option to avail the benefit given in favour of Para Teachers.

3. The benefit of Para Teacher to be given to the Sahayak/Sahayika was, on publication of the notification, found to be not beneficial. The petitioners, accordingly, intend to be reverted back to the status of Sahayak/Sahayika and they intend to remain in service till 65 years of age.

4. Various writ petitions on similar facts were considered by the Court and the Court by judgment dated 27th September, 2024 passed in WPA 24808 of 2024 (Antara Pandit & Ors –Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors.) directed the concerned State authorities

Page 2

including PBRSSM authorities to treat the petitioners as Sahayak/Sahayika and the option submitted by them to be treated as Para Teacher has been directed to be treated as cancelled.

5. As the facts of the case are similar to the case of Antara Pandit (supra), accordingly, in line with the above judgment, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the Mission Director to treat the petitioners as Sahayak/Sahayika and permit them to remain in service till 65 years of age.

6. No benefit in respect of Para Teacher will be allowed in their favour.

7. The writ petition stands disposed of.

8. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

9. Certified copy of the server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Amrita Sinha, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead